DOCTORAL SCHOOL E2M2
E2M2 COMPETITIVE RECRUITMENT FOR DOCTORAL CONTRACTS / CAMPAIGN 2020
Subject: Alternative reproductive tactics in structured populations of invasive fish species
Scientific Research theme: Evolutionary biology, Population biology, Ecophysiology
PhD supervisor (NOM Prénom) :
DECHAUME-MONCHARMONT F.-Xavier
Research unit:
LEHNA, UMR 5023, Lyon
Co-supervisor (NOM Prénom):
MEDOC VincentResearch unit:
ENES/CRNL, UMR CNRS 5292, St-Etienne
E-mail: fx.dechaume@univ-lyon1.fr E-Mail : vincent.medoc@univ-st-etienne.fr
E2M2 COMPETITIVE RECRUITMENT FOR DOCTORAL CONTRACTS / CAMPAIGN 2020
Subject: Alternative reproductive tactics in structured populations of invasive fish species
Scientific Research theme: Evolutionary biology, Population biology, Ecophysiology
PhD supervisor (NOM Prénom) :
DECHAUME-MONCHARMONT F.-Xavier
Research unit:
LEHNA, UMR 5023, Lyon
Co-supervisor (NOM Prénom):
MEDOC VincentResearch unit:
ENES/CRNL, UMR CNRS 5292, St-Etienne
E-mail: fx.dechaume@univ-lyon1.fr E-Mail : vincent.medoc@univ-st-etienne.fr
In polygynous or polygynandrous species, strongly biased operational sex-ratios (OSR) frequently induce high male reproductive skew. Such an intense male -male competition over access to females leads to the evolution of strategies characterized by high-competitiveness1, dominance, territoriality and aggressive partner monopolization. Yet, sympatric polymorphisms in which several alternative mating tactics co-exist as the result of frequency dependant games2. Population of dominant morphs in which males actively defend territory or females can be invaded by sneaker males, which are typically smaller and less aggressive than dominant males. This existence of multiple optimal investments in competitiveness is the result of the trade-off between being able to acquire many or high-quality resources and the ability to make the best use of these resources. Sneaker males typically attain many extra-pair copulations without investing in territorial defence, thus achieving reproductive success equivalent to the one of more dominant morphs.
During expansion of their range, invasive species experience contrasted conditions along the invasion gradient: the evolutionary pressures are rather different at the invasion front and at the range-core. For example, low densities at the edge of the range mean that males should experience lower sexual competition. Thus, investment into reproduction may trade-off with adaptations for more rapid dispersal: recent invasion unleashes evolutionary and ecological pressures and should favour low resource allocation to reproduction3.
Biological model and field work. We propose to explore the evolution of alternative reproductive tactics in a rapidly invasive fish species, the round goby Neogobius melanostomus. Round gobies, originated from the Ponto-caspian region, were introduced by boat water ballasts 20 years ago in the region of the Great Lakes in North America, where this species is now ubiquitous and has dramatic consequences on the native fauna4. More recently, populations are now settled in Western Europe rivers, notably in France: the invasion front is currently located in the rivers of Alsace-Lorraine in North-East of France5. The invasion front is expected to reach the river Rhône and the major alpine lakes (Lake Geneva, Lake Annecy, Lake Bourget) in the next few years.
In this species, a polymorphism of reproductive strategies has been characterized by the presence in the same population of several alternative tactics of reproduction6,7: certain so-called Guarder males invest substantially in reproduction (defence of the partner and the territory, nest building, parental care), and other males called Sneakers favour a lower investment in reproduction and seeking to obtain st ealthy copulations, less effective than those of the Guarders but also less costly in time and energy.
This biological model provides unique opportunity to compare behavioural, ecological and physiological performances between populations at different stages of the invasive process. This research project will involve several field trips in North-East of France for population sampling and in natura behavioural observations. The aim of the project is to decipher the underlying constraints controlling the alternative reproductive tactics and their local ecological success. To this end, different populations will be sampled along the invasion gradient and compared using a wide range of integrative tools including behavioural phenotyping, measures of acoustic communication using hydrophone8 and in vivo ecophysiology performances (swim ability, oxygen consumption, fecundity, aging, life span).
We also intend to compare the competitive ability of these morphs (Guarder vs. Sneaker) in terms of foraging or territoriality against other non-invasive species and therefore gain knowledge that will enhance the management and conservation of our freshwater ecosystems.
Supervision. This PhD thesis will be co-supervised by a behavioural ecologist specialized in the evolution of mating tactics (FXDM, Lehna, Lyon), an ecologist with special interest in foraging strategy and acoustic communication in fish species (VM, ENES – CNRL, Saint-Etienne), and an ecophysiologist (Loic Teulier, Lehna, Lyon) specialized in bioenergetic efficiency in fish species.
In this species, a polymorphism of reproductive strategies has been characterized by the presence in the same population of several alternative tactics of reproduction6,7: certain so-called Guarder males invest substantially in reproduction (defence of the partner and the territory, nest building, parental care), and other males called Sneakers favour a lower investment in reproduction and seeking to obtain st ealthy copulations, less effective than those of the Guarders but also less costly in time and energy.
This biological model provides unique opportunity to compare behavioural, ecological and physiological performances between populations at different stages of the invasive process. This research project will involve several field trips in North-East of France for population sampling and in natura behavioural observations. The aim of the project is to decipher the underlying constraints controlling the alternative reproductive tactics and their local ecological success. To this end, different populations will be sampled along the invasion gradient and compared using a wide range of integrative tools including behavioural phenotyping, measures of acoustic communication using hydrophone8 and in vivo ecophysiology performances (swim ability, oxygen consumption, fecundity, aging, life span).
We also intend to compare the competitive ability of these morphs (Guarder vs. Sneaker) in terms of foraging or territoriality against other non-invasive species and therefore gain knowledge that will enhance the management and conservation of our freshwater ecosystems.
Supervision. This PhD thesis will be co-supervised by a behavioural ecologist specialized in the evolution of mating tactics (FXDM, Lehna, Lyon), an ecologist with special interest in foraging strategy and acoustic communication in fish species (VM, ENES – CNRL, Saint-Etienne), and an ecophysiologist (Loic Teulier, Lehna, Lyon) specialized in bioenergetic efficiency in fish species.
Applicants. Applicants should have a Master (MSc) and a strong background in at least one of the following areas: animal behaviour, ecology, or ecophysiology. Solid knowledge in statistics would be appreciated.
References : 1 Dechaume-Moncharmont, F.-X. et al. Animal Behaviour 114, 249–260 (2016).
2 Baldauf, S. A. et al. Nature Communications 5, 5233 (2014). 3 Friesen, C. R. et al. Biol. Lett.
15, 20190339 (2019). 4 Kornis, M. S. et al. Journal of Fish Biology 80, 235–285 (2012).
5 Manné, S. et al. Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst. 02 (2013). 6 Myles-Gonzalez, E. et al.
Behav Ecol 26, 1083–1090 (2015). 7 McCallum, E. S. et al. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 76, 1562–
1570 (2018). 8 Zeyl, J. N. et al. Journal of Experimental Biology 216, 1075–1084 (2013)
References : 1 Dechaume-Moncharmont, F.-X. et al. Animal Behaviour 114, 249–260 (2016).
2 Baldauf, S. A. et al. Nature Communications 5, 5233 (2014). 3 Friesen, C. R. et al. Biol. Lett.
15, 20190339 (2019). 4 Kornis, M. S. et al. Journal of Fish Biology 80, 235–285 (2012).
5 Manné, S. et al. Knowl. Managt. Aquatic Ecosyst. 02 (2013). 6 Myles-Gonzalez, E. et al.
Behav Ecol 26, 1083–1090 (2015). 7 McCallum, E. S. et al. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 76, 1562–
1570 (2018). 8 Zeyl, J. N. et al. Journal of Experimental Biology 216, 1075–1084 (2013)